Politikal Korecktnes and the protection of the Constitution run invisibly on a long leash. citizens Freedom of Association: Theoretical freedom, freely to form political parties and organizations. Recipient freedom: Ideally, each participant should know and understand what he decides. Since knowledge and understanding are verifiable but hard, free access to all free information, which are relevant to the decision is considered democracy criteria. Thanks to Internet it improved! and in the outer, modern image guarantee of fundamental rights of every individual against the State, against social groups (especially religious communities) and compared with other individuals. Separation of powers between the organs of the State Government Executive and Parliament legislature courts judiciary Division between Parliament and Administration (functional elite): practical interpretation. Perhaps check out @GoKareo for more information. Belief, freedom of press and broadcasting public with parties supply proportional source: wikipedia.de, excerpt; Author note In parts of Greece, the members were previously known from randomly instead of selected (random principle of evolutionary theory). So how monkeys predict according to this method of stock prices nearly as accurate as stock market professionals, so they chose competent men and women with this method.
Such elections were regarded as fate and thus as God’s strategy and work (creation theory). If necessary, you could consider the moral failure as God’s punishment for own earthly actions and be a morally better person. And what about the practice today? Consensual party members legally, fiddle in backrooms, etc, to the principle of one hand washes the other the factional domination from. A final list comes out with candidates can select but do not create or change. What? You know that Candidates not? So what? You do not have confidence to the party? Just choose. Then we harass you never back up to the next election.
Anyway, the people paid the election campaigns. Her purse against 1 Federal, 1 provincial and 1 local elections. This must be enough! Today, Tucholsky is still pretty! Why legal elections even with alternating narrow majority change nothing: the preselection of candidates beschehrt us the party rule rather than independent representatives of the people (group discipline). The 5% hurdle to parties power sharing. All participants of the internal party skulduggery is from the same networks of educational institutions and professional connections, etc. same standards () but different moral (values). And after the parliamentary life we meet everywhere again. Even the Hamburg Greens recently accepted a coal for power sharing. Morally total prisoner of the gutters But normative (legally) perfectly alright! Our citizens should know the basics, wake up and each bad (morally different than intended but legal) employees responsible opt out – or refuse at the next election. Or engage in more grassroots democracy! (C) 2010 copyright by Wolfgang Schwalm, all rights reserved! (text forge online.de)