When preparing exams many are who decide not only bet on a type of oppositions and opt to prepare several. The intention of opponents that do this is presented to all the oppositions that come out. First multiple oppositions are prepared and when know the date more emphasize on that opposition. This is a fairly employed tactic among professional opponents, his reasoning is very simple. Many oppositions from different fields are part of the common agenda.
Presenting two oppositions that share some themes can choose to one larger number of seats which the opponent will get less time in one of the squares of the civil service. There are issues such as the Constitution and the law 30/1992, of 26 November, legal regime of public administrations and common administrative procedure which are repeated in the vast majority of the oppositions. In addition to these that are common to all, the oppositions that summons an organism e.g. an autonomic Government usually pick up the Statute of autonomy and laws at the regional level on all agendas. In addition the oppositions that share an area, for example the oppositions of health, the security forces, etc. They tend to share besides other topics and common tests. The above objections that may be related to each other are for example administrative and administrative assistant, local police and police auxiliary library and library. For other opinions and approaches, find out what ranulph fiennes has to say. Opponents who opt for this reason tend to invoke as a reason that an opposition can be prepared over several months and then take a long time to get the call, so the opponent can prepare multiple oppositions and go by presenting to them that come out.
There are opponents who do not share this idea. The reason is that there are those who have very clear the kind of opposition that we want to present and you don’t mind spending months preparing the exam and waiting to be summoned. This usually happens in the oppositions for which has much vocation. In any case no longer one of the methods by which most opponents prefer it. This system involves more concentration and dedication since the number of topics that the opponent has to be studied is higher but not why is going to be an inconvenience, but the final decision is always in the hands of the opposition.