We are collecting food and no waste”outraged response to criticism of the panels. So the outraged response to criticism of the panels is registered as a trade mark. Eva Bernardi, spokeswoman for Bavaria which was Hartz IV gotta go! Board comments in response to the “article in the courier of Dachau by the 05.09.09: reexamined this criticism is really insufficient.” More than concern for the supposed bad food the real intention of Germany should be considered more accurately wide boards and their organizers. Because the organized charity of the charitable boards knows only one goal: to support the shift from social welfare to the welfare state. With a discharge democratization of low-income citizens. There is no legal entitlement to assistance by the boards. The management consultant McKinsey managed the organizational requirements for this social project of charity”and the German economy helped willingly not only with in-kind donations, such as transport and facilities. Echo street takes a slightly different approach. Germany is approaching for some years of the third ss World and more and more citizens denied the dignified participation in society.
“” The food companies and companies donate “the unsaleable or their expired food pull these donations” then from the tax, the expensive disposal save himself. This is done on the backs of the people television held by the fair wage of a decent employment and the taxpayer. The panels are an indictment in the truest sense of the word. They are”a sign of decadence and a years of lobbying of the German export industry, the AG of Germany. Unemployed people are cost and barriers in the global competition in which daily liable for social security work is broken down.
Politikal Korecktnes and the protection of the Constitution run invisibly on a long leash. citizens Freedom of Association: Theoretical freedom, freely to form political parties and organizations. Recipient freedom: Ideally, each participant should know and understand what he decides. Since knowledge and understanding are verifiable but hard, free access to all free information, which are relevant to the decision is considered democracy criteria. Thanks to Internet it improved! and in the outer, modern image guarantee of fundamental rights of every individual against the State, against social groups (especially religious communities) and compared with other individuals. Separation of powers between the organs of the State Government Executive and Parliament legislature courts judiciary Division between Parliament and Administration (functional elite): practical interpretation. Perhaps check out @GoKareo for more information. Belief, freedom of press and broadcasting public with parties supply proportional source: wikipedia.de, excerpt; Author note In parts of Greece, the members were previously known from randomly instead of selected (random principle of evolutionary theory). So how monkeys predict according to this method of stock prices nearly as accurate as stock market professionals, so they chose competent men and women with this method.
Such elections were regarded as fate and thus as God’s strategy and work (creation theory). If necessary, you could consider the moral failure as God’s punishment for own earthly actions and be a morally better person. And what about the practice today? Consensual party members legally, fiddle in backrooms, etc, to the principle of one hand washes the other the factional domination from. A final list comes out with candidates can select but do not create or change. What? You know that Candidates not? So what? You do not have confidence to the party? Just choose. Then we harass you never back up to the next election.
Anyway, the people paid the election campaigns. Her purse against 1 Federal, 1 provincial and 1 local elections. This must be enough! Today, Tucholsky is still pretty! Why legal elections even with alternating narrow majority change nothing: the preselection of candidates beschehrt us the party rule rather than independent representatives of the people (group discipline). The 5% hurdle to parties power sharing. All participants of the internal party skulduggery is from the same networks of educational institutions and professional connections, etc. same standards () but different moral (values). And after the parliamentary life we meet everywhere again. Even the Hamburg Greens recently accepted a coal for power sharing. Morally total prisoner of the gutters But normative (legally) perfectly alright! Our citizens should know the basics, wake up and each bad (morally different than intended but legal) employees responsible opt out – or refuse at the next election. Or engage in more grassroots democracy! (C) 2010 copyright by Wolfgang Schwalm, all rights reserved! (text forge online.de)
The resignation of a sympathy carrier of German policy with Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg loses one of its most sympathetic German policy. Zu Guttenberg has succeeded, that finally time again young people in politics have interested? But this resignation has to do only with the doctoral thesis? Zu Guttenberg had from the outset as well as all the people on his side, he was seen as a new Chancellor. But unfortunately also envious with it brings faster success. Let’s take the example of the Gorch Fock. So has acted to Guttenberg just so, as it actually is the normal case.
If something was going to happen in a normal operation, then these employees would be dismissed but also. It is definitely not OK, that about half of the work is plagiarized, as if that would make a “small” College student, he would be going on not only his doctorate, but also her career would be a single disaster. Zu Guttenberg would in my opinion aware be need,. that is something no if in order, so he demands honesty and hard work by his own students. Also the reason that he had family, is of course logical on the one hand, on the other hand, many students of a family and children have and with them such a failure would not be tolerated also. But zu Guttenberg has obviously learned from its mistakes. He “returned his doctorate” and admitted serious faults. It remains questionable whether then precisely withdrawal is the best way.
Because thus it gives is basically defeated all his opponents and especially the media. The rationale that its credibility would have suffered, is maybe not so untrue, but still were more than 85% of German citizens of think that this was a mistake after his resignation. Because certainly suffered his confidence, but you can rebuild this, so even the German Chancellor Angela Merkel to last behind one of their most important Ministers said. However, what is now with his ideas and his reforms? Well, he has begun to change conscription. One could almost say that with the end of compulsory of military service a small revolution has succeeded, because few other politicians would probably come up with this idea, or would have tried to implement them, because it takes strong nerves and an extreme willpower that zu Guttenberg at least outward and repeatedly had, and also has. With zu Guttenberg German politics today has lost a very important politician in any case. Maybe human he has made a big mistake with its thesis, but zu Guttenberg has mobilized the masses and to the make with installed. He impressed people with his style, because he was just a politician who was close to the people. I myself was the big election campaign at an event to Guttenbergs and was excited about his relaxed, natural way. We must be curious who may occupy this space in the next few days. It is questionable whether this leads to Guttenberg’s plans so, as he has imagined it. 01 March 2011, Desiree-Sophie Lepell